CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD – Unalleged Violations

Single Topic for Decision 2745M

View all topics for Decision 2745M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

The employer did not have sufficient notice to defend against an unalleged unilateral change theory because the union did not raise the theory during PERB’s investigatory or hearing process or in its post-hearing brief. On multiple occasions, the union referred only to allegations that the employer had engaged in surface bargaining. (pp. 15-16.)