CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD – Unalleged Violations

Single Topic for Decision 2761M


View all topics for Decision 2761M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.04000 – Unalleged Violations

While the complaint in the instant case adequately alleged an independent claim of interference with union’s rights, even setting that conclusion aside, the unalleged violation doctrine provided a basis for the Board to consider interference with both employee and organizational rights. (See, e.g., County of Santa Clara (2017) PERB Decision No. 2539-M, pp. 16-17 [applying unalleged violation doctrine to independent interference claim, after having found complaint did not adequately allege it].)