CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; COMPLAINT – Concurrent or Derivative Violations

Single Topic for Decision 2846M

View all topics for Decision 2846M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

While employees’ use of a vaccination ascertainment form created by their union may qualify as MMBA-protected activity, the union’s appeal stated that the outcome of its interference claim turns on whether the employer took unilateral action on a matter within the scope of representation. The Board therefore found it amounts to a derivative interference claim. (p. 25.)