CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE – In General

Single Topic for Decision 2847M


View all topics for Decision 2847M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.01000 – In General

An employer’s announcement of a new policy as a fait accompli would not trigger a duty to demand bargaining and cannot support a waiver defense. Thus, waiver and timeliness normally apply in separate circumstances: announcing a fait accompli can trigger the statute of limitations for a unilateral change charge but cannot support a waiver by inaction defense, while proposing a new policy does not trigger the statute of limitations but can lead PERB to find waiver by inaction if the union does not respond to the proposal within a reasonable time. (County of Merced (2020) PERB Decision No. 2740-M, p. 20.) (pp. 17-18.)