REMEDIES FOR UNFAIR PRACTICES; REINSTATEMENT; BACKPAY BENEFITS – Back Pay; Interest

Single Topic for Decision 3004M

View all topics for Decision 3004M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

In a long line of decisions, PERB has held that if the charging party establishes a unilateral change involving extra work, then extra pay is a proper remedy as long as there is a reasonable basis for estimating it. (City of Pasadena, supra, PERB Order No. Ad-406-M, pp. 8, 12-13 & adopting compliance order at pp. 7, 10; Mark Twain Union Elementary School District (2003) PERB Decision No. 1548, p. 9; Corning, supra, PERB Decision No. 399, pp. 10, 16-17; San Mateo City School District (1984) PERB Decision No. 375a, p. 6; see also California State Employees Assn. v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 923, 946-947 [citing with approval the Board’s remedial approach in Corning, supra, PERB Decision No. 399].)