CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; DEFERRAL TO ARBITRATION – Post Arbitration; Repugnancy
Single Topic for Decision A231S
View all topics for Decision A231S
Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text
1102.02000 – Post Arbitration; Repugnancy
* * * OVERRULED by multiple decisions, as recognized in State of California (Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) (2024) PERB Decision No. 2926-S, pp. 16-19, because relied on notion that deferral was jurisdictional rather than discretionary, applied standards that are now superseded, and improperly bifurcated interrelated claims * * *
Board affirmed ALJ's denial of motion to dismiss on grounds of deferral to arbitration where grievance machinery did not cover an alleged violation of 3519(b) of the Dills Act. This is a case of first impression where a (b) case stands alone before PERB. There is a dissent.