MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)

Single Topic for Decision A453H

View all topics for Decision A453H

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

1503.03000 – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)

The Board rejected the University’s appeal arguing that a union petitioning for unit modification should be required to show proof of support under PERB Regulation 32781 because, when the petition was filed, the University had not yet completed the process of reclassifying unrepresented employees and it projected to reclassify a significant number of additional employees into the new classification. (p. 14.) The administrative determination appropriately reasoned that the proposed addition sought by a unit modification petition at the time the petition is filed is determinative and “not whether the proposed addition grows or shrinks after the time the petition is filed.” (pp. 13-14.)