REMEDIES FOR UNFAIR PRACTICES; INJUNCTIVE RELIEF – Standards for Obtaining Injunctive Relief
Single Topic for Decision I062H
View all topics for Decision I062H
Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text
1207.02000 – Standards for Obtaining Injunctive Relief
The University’s “disproportionate economic impact” theory also failed because it did not marshal meaningful evidence to support the argument’s factual predicate. The only evidence the University presented about disproportionate economic impact came from one paragraph in a declaration from the University’s Executive Director of Labor Relations, that he is “informed and believe[s] that virtually all the private companies that provide replacement workers during a strike require at least a 36-hour commitment” and that he is “informed and believe[s]” the cost of a replacement is “at least 1 to 3 times more than the cost of a University employee.” Neither of these statements gave evidence about the actual cost of the University’s replacement workers for the strikes at issue. (p. 11, fn. 9.)