No items found
Single Topic for Decision
Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text
No items found
No evidence that the intent of a voter was misrepresented by counting a ballot with more than one mark. The NLRB has clearly stated that it will "count a ballot where, despite an irregularity in the manner in which it has been marked, it clearly expresses the voter's intent." Given the voter's written comment regarding the "no rep. mistake", it is appropriate to conclude that the completed "x" in the PCCE box reflected the choice intended by the voter, despite the fact that the voter also made a "" in the No Representation box. PERB requires a voter to confirm