Home | Decision SubTopics | 1105.09000 – Opinion Evidence and Expert Testimony

All notes for Subtopic 1105.09000 – Opinion Evidence and Expert Testimony

DecisionDescriptionPERC Vol.PERC IndexDate
2388Ma City of Palo Alto * * * CLARIFIED BY Trustees of the California State University v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (2026) 118 Cal.App.5th 90 and Trustees of the California State University (2026) PERB Decision No. 2915a-H * * *
1105.09000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; EVIDENCE; Opinion Evidence and Expert Testimony
CLARIFIED ON OTHER GROUNDS BY Trustees of the California State University v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (2026) 118 Cal.App.5th 90 and Trustees of the California State University (2026) PERB Decision No. 2915a-H. Questions of statutory interpretation are not a proper subject for expert witness testimony. more or view all topics or full text.
41 162 04/10/17
A248Ea Fremont Union Union High School District
1105.09000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; EVIDENCE; Opinion Evidence and Expert Testimony
Statements in a grievance which constitute the Association's legal opinion that the District violated state laws is not admissible evidence; p. 4. more or view all topics or full text.
18 25013 11/23/93
0318Ea Pittsburg Unified School District
1105.09000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; EVIDENCE; Opinion Evidence and Expert Testimony
Purpose of requesting reconsideration on ground of "newly discovered evidence" is to permit Board to have access to evidence unavailable at time of hearing which could effect the underlying determination that the respondent acted unlawfully. more or view all topics or full text.
8 15067 04/02/84