Decision 0386H – University of California Riverside

LA-CE-78-H

Decision Date: June 14, 1984

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 8
Perc Index: 15111

Decision Headnotes

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver

Rejection of request for an extension of time to appeal a dismissal of an unfair practice charge proper because no extraordinary circumstances were shown where appellant claimed he was a "victim of the holiday mails." Also, appellant failed to comply with Regulation 32132 (a) by filing his request for extension late and 32135 by failing to file the appeal itself.

1503.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS
1503.02000 – Regulations Considered (By Number)

32135; Rejection of request for an extension of time to appeal a dismissal of an unfair practice charge proper because no extraordinary circumstances were shown where appellant claimed he was a "victim of the holiday mails." Also, appellant failed to comply with Regulation 32132(a) by filing his request for extension late and 32135 by failing to file the appeal itself. 32132(a); Rejection of request for an extension of time to appeal a dismissal of an unfair practice charge proper because no extraordinary circumstances were shown where appellant claimed he was a "victim of the holiday mails." Also, appellant failed to comply with Regulation 32132(a) by filing his request for extension late and 32135 by failing to file the appeal itself.