Decision 0397E – Los Angeles USD (Watts)

LA-PN-42

Decision Date: August 16, 1984

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 8
Perc Index: 15147

Decision Headnotes

1502.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; PUBLIC NOTICE
1502.07000 – Scope of Obligation

Statutory requirement that district present proposal at public meeting does not require district to verbally describe contents of proposal; p. 5.

1502.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; PUBLIC NOTICE
1502.02000 – Initial Proposals

Section 3547(a) mandates presentation of all initial proposals at a public meeting. As complaint alleged the meeting was closed to the public, complaint stated prima facie violation; p. 5.

1502.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; PUBLIC NOTICE
1502.09000 – Complaint/Timeliness/Standing/Service

Section 3547(a) mandates presentation of all initial proposals at a public meeting. As complaint alleged, the meeting was closed to the public, complaint stated prima facie violation; p. 5. Mere allegations that method of sunshining classified employee organization proposals differs from certificated employee organization proposals does not state prima facie case in absence that method is legally deficient; p. 6.

1502.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; PUBLIC NOTICE
1502.01000 – In General

Mere allegations that method of sunshining classified employee organization proposals differs from certificated employee organization proposals does not state prima facie case in absence that method is legally deficient; p. 6.

606.00000 – EMPLOYER REFUSAL TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; NEGOTIATIONS; INDICIA OF SURFACE OR BAD FAITH BARGAINING; TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES
606.12000 – Failure to Sunshine Proposals

Section 3547(a) mandates presentation of all initial proposals at a public meeting. As complaint alleged the meeting was closed to the public, complaint stated prima facie violation; p. 5. Mere allegations that method of sunshining classified employee organization proposals differs from certificated employee organization proposals does not state prima facie case in absence that method is legally deficient; p. 6.