Decision 0726H – California State Employees Association (O'Connell)

SF-CO-14-H

Decision Date: March 21, 1989

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 13
Perc Index: 20066

Decision Headnotes

806.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DEFENSES
806.02000 – Internal Union Procedures

The subject of an internal union procedure will be a violation of the duty of fair representation if there is a knowing misrepresentation of facts concerning the subject in the ratification process and the subject substantially impacts the employment relationship; p. 7.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver

Failure to specify the issues or otherwise provide the Board with enough information to rule on the appeal will result in the Board's affirmance of the ALJ's dismissal; p. 3.

1503.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS
1503.02000 – Regulations Considered (By Number)

32300 - An appeal must afford both the respondent and the Board with enough information to answer, and rule. Failure to state the rationale or to identify the portion of the proposed decision to which exception is taken will result in dismissal; p. 3.

800.00000 – UNION UNFAIR PRACTICES; DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION
800.04000 – Scope of Duty; Internal Union Affairs

The exclusive representative's knowing misrepresentation of a fact that has a substantial impact on the relationship of the employer and the unit members during the contract ratification process is a violation of the duty of fair representation. A breach of the duty will not be found where the exclusive representative is guilty of mere negligence or poor judgment; pp. 7-8.