Decision 0918E – Los Angeles Unified School District (Association of Public School Supervisory Employees)
LA-CE-3087
Decision Date: January 7, 1992
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Perc Vol: 16
Perc Index: 23016
Decision Headnotes
504.04000 – Timing of Action
Providing employee with Notice of Intent to Dismiss 23 days after a request by employee for a performance evaluation review is not sufficient to demonstrate nexus as timing alone is not sufficient for an inference of unlawful motive; pp. 3-4.
602.01000 – In General
Employer's failure to reschedule one meeting is insufficient to show a policy change by the employer that had a generalized effect or continuing impact upon the terms and conditions of employment of bargaining unit members; p. 3.
602.05000 – Impact and Extent
Employer's failure to reschedule one meeting is insufficient to show a policy change by the employer that had a generalized effect or continuing impact upon the terms and conditions of employment of bargaining unit members; p. 3.
1101.02000 – Amended Charge or Complaint; Withdrawal of Charge; Relation Back Doctrine
Relation Back Doctrine does not apply to facts of this case as allegations of retaliation and interference raised in amended complaint concerned events surrounding a demotion, and the allegations made in the original complaint concerned scheduling of a meeting regarding performance evaluation, i.e. a different issue based on a different event; p. 3.