Decision 1069H – Regents of the University of California (Chan)
SF-CE-398-H
Decision Date: November 28, 1994
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: UC discriminated against employee for her exercise of protected activity.
Disposition: Appeal dismissed as defective.
Perc Vol: 19
Perc Index: 26024
Decision Headnotes
1101.03000 – Computation of Six-Month Period
For charge to be timely, charging party must establish that she did not know, or did not have reason to know, of the employer's violation of her rights within six months of the filing of her unfair practice charge; p. 3, dismissal letter.
1107.20000 – Other
Compliance with regulations governing appeals (32635) is required to afford the respondent and the Board with an adequate opportunity to address the issues raised, and noncompliance will warrant dismissal of the appeal; p. 2.
1503.03000 – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)
32635. The appeal does not comply with PERB regulation 32635 as it does not identify any specific factual error or address the timeliness of her unfair practice charge; p. 2. 32635. Compliance with regulations governing appeals is required to afford the respondent and the Board with an adequate opportunity to address the issues raised, and noncompliance will warrant dismissal of the appeal; p. 2.