Decision 1069H – Regents of the University of California (Chan)

SF-CE-398-H

Decision Date: November 28, 1994

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 19
Perc Index: 26024

Decision Headnotes

1101.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING CHARGE
1101.03000 – Computation of Six-Month Period

For charge to be timely, charging party must establish that she did not know, or did not have reason to know, of the employer's violation of her rights within six months of the filing of her unfair practice charge; p. 3, dismissal letter.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.20000 – Other

Compliance with regulations governing appeals (32635) is required to afford the respondent and the Board with an adequate opportunity to address the issues raised, and noncompliance will warrant dismissal of the appeal; p. 2.

1503.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS
1503.03000 – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)

32635. The appeal does not comply with PERB regulation 32635 as it does not identify any specific factual error or address the timeliness of her unfair practice charge; p. 2. 32635. Compliance with regulations governing appeals is required to afford the respondent and the Board with an adequate opportunity to address the issues raised, and noncompliance will warrant dismissal of the appeal; p. 2.