Decision 1178E – Santa Clarita Community College District

LA-CE-3674

Decision Date: December 4, 1996

Decision Type: PERB Decision

Description: Union appealed dismissal of its charge that District unlawfully disciplined an employee.

Disposition: Dismissed. Union faffed to establish that District’s action was in retaliation for employee’s protected conduct

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 21
Perc Index: 28018

Decision Headnotes

504.00000 – EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL MOTIVATION; NEXUS
504.02000 – Disparate Treatment

Nexus not demonstrated where allegation of disparate treatment not supported by specific evidence.

504.00000 – EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL MOTIVATION; NEXUS
504.04000 – Timing of Action

Where charge alleged that protected activity took place after adverse action, Board found no unlawful motivation; p. 2, warning letter.

504.00000 – EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION; EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL MOTIVATION; NEXUS
504.08000 – Cursory Investigation

Nexus not demonstrated where allegation of cursory investigation not supported by other evidence gathered during investigation.

1100.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE
1100.01000 – In General/Prima Facie Case

Nexus not demonstrated where allegation of disparate treatment not supported by specific evidence. Nexus not demonstrated where allegation of cursory investigation not supported by other evidence gathered during investigation.

1100.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE
1100.02000 – Investigation of Charge

Nexus not demonstrated where allegation of disparate treatment not supported by specific evidence. Nexus not demonstrated where allegation of cursory investigation not supported by other evidence gathered during investigation.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver

Regs. 32635: Board refuses to consider document presented for the first time on appeal where party fails to provide good cause why evidence could not have been presented during Board agent's investigation; p. 2, fn. 2.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.06000 – De Novo Review; Standard of Review by Board

Regs. 32635: Board refuses to consider document presented for the first time on appeal where party fails to provide good cause why evidence should not have been presented during Board agent's investigation; p. 2, fn. 2.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.20000 – Other

Regs. 32635: Board refuses to consider document presented for the first time on appeal where party fails to provide good cause why evidence could not have been presented during Board agent's investigation; p. 2, fn. 2.

1503.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS
1503.03000 – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)

Regs. 32635: Board refuses to consider document presented for the first time on appeal where party fails to provide good cause why evidence could not have been presented during Board agent's investigation; p. 2, fn. 2.