Decision 1757M – County of Colusa
SA-CE-297-M
Decision Date: March 8, 2005
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: County employee alleged discrimination where county allegedly paid improper compensation for additional duties.
Disposition: To establish a prima facie case of discrimination charging party must include facts to show that protected activity took place. Appeal may not include new evidence without showing of good cause.
Perc Vol: 29
Perc Index: 101
Decision Headnotes
501.01000 – In General; Elements of Prima Facie Case
Where county employee alleged improper compensation for administering additional duties there was no prima facie case for lack of facts showing that charging party engaged in protected activity of any kind.
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver
To raise an issue for the first time on appeal is a violation of PERB Regulation section 32635(b) which requires a showing of good cause to include a new charge or new supporting evidence on appeal. Charging Party included nothing indicating why the issue of reclassification of duties was not included in her underlying charge.
1107.04000 – Unalleged Violations
To raise an issue for the first time on appeal is a violation of PERB Regulation section 32635(b) which requires a showing of good cause to include a new charge or new supporting evidence on appeal. Charging Party included nothing indicating why the issue of reclassification of duties was not included in her underlying charge.