Decision 1843H – Regents of the University of California

SF-CE-786-H

Decision Date: May 18, 2006

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 30
Perc Index: 124

Decision Headnotes

300.00000 – UNFAIR PRACTICE ISSUES; PROTECTED ACTIVITIES
300.01000 – In General

Charging party failed to describe the employee’s protected activity. It was not clear what was meant by “union contact” nor did the charge indicate when the employee filed her previous grievance.”

300.00000 – UNFAIR PRACTICE ISSUES; PROTECTED ACTIVITIES
300.12000 – Insistence on Union Representation

The charge failed to allege that union representation was requested and denied.

408.00000 – EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; INTERFERENCE WITH RIGHT TO SELF OR UNION REPRESENTATION; WEINGARTEN RIGHTS
408.01000 – In General

The charge failed to allege that union representation was requested and denied.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver

To raise an issue for the first time on appeal is a violation of PERB Regulation section 32635(b) which requires a showing of good cause to include a new charge or new supporting evidence on appeal. Charging Party failed to demonstrate good cause for the presentation of new allegations and/or supporting evidence on appeal, and nothing in the documents filed related to the appeal indicates there is good cause.