Decision 1865M – City of Santa Clarita
LA-CE-299-M
Decision Date: December 7, 2006
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Perc Vol: 31
Perc Index: 22
Decision Headnotes
201.00000 – PARTIES; DEFINITIONS; WHO IS AN EMPLOYER?
201.04000 – Joint, Single or Dual Employers
201.04000 – Joint, Single or Dual Employers
Despite charging party’s assertion that he was employed by both the City and his private employer, there was no evidence that he was employed by the City.
102.00000 – PERB: OPERATION, JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY; SCOPE OF PERB JURISDICTION
102.01000 – In General/Exclusive Initial Jurisdiction-Deferral to Arbitration; Deference by Reviewing Courts
102.01000 – In General/Exclusive Initial Jurisdiction-Deferral to Arbitration; Deference by Reviewing Courts
Board agent properly determined that PERB does not have jurisdiction over a retaliation case involving an employee of a private company that contracts with the City, because the employer is not a public employer under the MMBA.
201.00000 – PARTIES; DEFINITIONS; WHO IS AN EMPLOYER?
201.01000 – In General
201.01000 – In General
A private company that contracts with the City to provide transportation service is not a public employer under the MMBA.