Decision 2301C – Los Angeles Superior Court
LA-CE-40-C
Decision Date: December 21, 2012
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Description: The charge alleged that the Los Angeles Superior Court violated the Trial Court Act by issuing an improper notice of suspension.
Disposition: The Board upheld the dismissal of the charge for failure to provide proof of service on the respondent.
Perc Vol: 37
Perc Index: 148
Decision Headnotes
1100.01000 – In General/Prima Facie Case
Charging party failed to establish sufficient grounds for overturning Board agent’s dismissal of charge for failure to comply with requirements of PERB Regulation 32615(c) requiring service of unfair practice charge on respondent and filing of proof of service with PERB. Charging party provided no explanation for her failure to respond to Board agent’s repeated inquiries prior to dismissal of charge, and failed to provide clear evidence of a valid proof of service.
1100.02000 – Investigation of Charge
Charging party failed to establish sufficient grounds for overturning Board agent’s dismissal of charge for failure to comply with requirements of PERB Regulation 32615(c) requiring service of unfair practice charge on respondent and filing of proof of service with PERB. Charging party provided no explanation for her failure to respond to Board agent’s repeated inquiries prior to dismissal of charge, and failed to provide clear evidence of a valid proof of service.
1100.05000 – Dismissal of Charge; Appeal
Charging party failed to establish sufficient grounds for overturning Board agent’s dismissal of charge for failure to comply with requirements of PERB Regulation 32615(c) requiring service of unfair practice charge on respondent and filing of proof of service with PERB. Charging party provided no explanation for her failure to respond to Board agent’s repeated inquiries prior to dismissal of charge, and failed to provide clear evidence of a valid proof of service.