Decision A164E – Peralta Community College District

SF-UM-385; D-156

Decision Date: June 18, 1987

Decision Type: PERB Decision

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 11
Perc Index: 18110

Decision Headnotes

1303.00000 – REPRESENTATION ISSUES; ELECTIONS
1303.01000 – In General

As issue voted on by employees was identical to that which would have been presented by a decertification election alone, Board finds that employees were not misled or otherwise affected by the appearance on the ballot of the unit configuration question. Therefore, no new election ordered; pp. 10-11.

1310.00000 – REPRESENTATION ISSUES; UNIT MODIFICATION
1310.04000 – Decertification and Unit Modification

A decertification petition, which is properly filed in established unit and contains requisite proof of service, shall be given priority over a unit modification petition, so long as no formal determination on the merits of the unit modification petition have been made at the time the decertification petition is filed; p. 8.

1309.00000 – REPRESENTATION ISSUES; UNIT DETERMINATION/CRITERIA (SEE ALSO WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE?, SECTION 200)
1309.01000 – In General/Definition of Appropriate Unit

Where the appropriateness of the unit is in dispute, the Board must make a formal determination as to the appropriate unit configuration; p. 7.

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.03000 – Remand for Further Hearing; Remand to General Counsel

As record is insufficient to allow Board to make any determination of status of certain employees in decertification petition, Board remands issue to regional office; p. 11.

1302.00000 – REPRESENTATION ISSUES; DECERTIFICATION
1302.01000 – In General; Filing Requirements

A decertification petition, which is properly filed in established unit and contains requisite proof of support, shall be given priority over a unit modification petition, so long as no formal determination on the merits of the unit modification petition have been made at the time the decertification petition is filed; p. 8. As record is insufficient to allow Board to make any determination of status of certain employees in decertification petition, Board remands issue to regional office; p. 11. As issue voted on by employees was identical to that which would have been presented by a decertification election alone, Board finds that employees were not misled or otherwise affected by the appearance on the ballot of the unit configuration question. Therefore, no new election ordered; pp. 10-11. election ordered; pp. 10-11.

1303.00000 – REPRESENTATION ISSUES; ELECTIONS
1303.03000 – Ballot Language

As issue voted on by employees was identical to that which would have been presented by a decertification election alone, Board finds that employees were not misled or otherwise affected by the appearance on the ballot of the unit configuration question. Therefore, no new election ordered; pp. 10-11.