Decision A299Sa – California State Employees Association (Hutchinson)

SF-CO-39-S

Decision Date: December 21, 1999

Decision Type: Administrative Appeal

Description: The Board denied charging party’s request for reconsideration of the decision denying her request that the Board accept her late-filed amendments to her appeals of the dismissal In PERB Decision No. 299.

Disposition: Denied. The request for reconsideration fails to demonstrate grounds sufficient to comply with PERB Regulations.

View Full Text (PDF)

Perc Vol: 24
Perc Index: 31030

Decision Headnotes

1107.00000 – CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES;PROCEDURES BEFORE THE BOARD
1107.10000 – Request for Reconsideration

Request denied since it does not claim that the Board's decision contains prejudicial error of fact, or that charging party has discovered new evidence. Consequently, charging party's request for reconsideration fails to demonstrate grounds sufficient to comply with PERB Regulation 32410; p. 2.

1503.00000 – MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS
1503.03000 – Regulations Considered (By Number) (Continued)

Request denied since it does not claim that the Board's decision contains prejudicial error of fact, or that charging party has discovered new evidence. Consequently, charging party's request for reconsideration fails to demonstrate grounds sufficient to comply with PERB Regulation 32410; p. 2.