MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES; REGULATIONS – Regulations Considered (By Number)

Single Topic for Decision 0386H

View all topics for Decision 0386H

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

32135; Rejection of request for an extension of time to appeal a dismissal of an unfair practice charge proper because no extraordinary circumstances were shown where appellant claimed he was a "victim of the holiday mails." Also, appellant failed to comply with Regulation 32132(a) by filing his request for extension late and 32135 by failing to file the appeal itself. 32132(a); Rejection of request for an extension of time to appeal a dismissal of an unfair practice charge proper because no extraordinary circumstances were shown where appellant claimed he was a "victim of the holiday mails." Also, appellant failed to comply with Regulation 32132(a) by filing his request for extension late and 32135 by failing to file the appeal itself.