EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE, RESTRAINT, COERCION; DEFENSES – Business Necessity

Single Topic for Decision 1664M

View all topics for Decision 1664M

Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text

Although Poon stated a prima facie case of interference, the City contended that her involuntary transfer was due to lack of work in her department. Local 790 was advised of this response in the warning letter but did not file an amended charge to dispute this fact and so did not refute the employer’s claim of legitimate business reasons for its action.