EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE; RESTRAINT, COERCION; SURVEILLANCE – Statements to Employees, Creating Impression of Surveillance
Single Topic for Decision 2867M
View all topics for Decision 2867M
Full Decision Text (click on the link to view): Full Text
403.00000 – EMPLOYER INTERFERENCE; RESTRAINT, COERCION; SURVEILLANCE
403.04000 – Statements to Employees, Creating Impression of Surveillance
403.04000 – Statements to Employees, Creating Impression of Surveillance
Charter subsections that require actual surveillance of employees engaging in strike activities and create the appearance of surveillance found unlawful. Surveillance of protected activity, or creating the appearance of surveillance, totally conflicts with the MMBA. (County of San Bernardino (2018) PERB Decision No. 2556-M, p. 20 [employer photographing or videotaping employees or openly engaging in recordkeeping of employees participating in union activities is unlawful surveillance because of the tendency to intimidate employees].) (pp. 31-32.)