All notes for Subtopic 1309.14000 – Splitting of Classifications

DecisionDescriptionPERC Vol.PERC IndexDate
2509E Oakland Unified School District
1309.14000: REPRESENTATION ISSUES; UNIT DETERMINATION/CRITERIA (SEE ALSO WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE?, SECTION 200); Splitting of Classifications
The Board has interpreted EERA to disfavor splitting a single classification across multiple units when the employees within the classification perform the same work under virtually identical conditions of employment. more or view all topics or full text.
4111112/29/16

1309.14000: REPRESENTATION ISSUES; UNIT DETERMINATION/CRITERIA (SEE ALSO WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE?, SECTION 200); Splitting of Classifications
A parity agreement for the classified employee unit does not violate the section 3545(b)(3) prohibition against placement of certificated and classified employees in the same bargaining unit. The agreement assured classified employees that their salaries would be increased by the same percentage as teachers if in subsequent bargaining the teachers received a larger increase. [44 Cal.3d at 805-806] more or view all topics or full text.
1086E San Francisco Unified School District
1309.14000: REPRESENTATION ISSUES; UNIT DETERMINATION/CRITERIA (SEE ALSO WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE?, SECTION 200); Splitting of Classifications
EERA does not preclude in every case an employee's placement in more than one bargaining unit. An employee holding two positions with the same employer might well be included in two separate bargaining units representated by two different exclusive representatives; p. 28, proposed dec. more or view all topics or full text.
192606403/01/95
0820E Hemet Unified School District
1309.14000: REPRESENTATION ISSUES; UNIT DETERMINATION/CRITERIA (SEE ALSO WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE?, SECTION 200); Splitting of Classifications
Individual analysis approach appropriate in unit modification case where same disputed position is held by several different employees at different work sites; pp. 6-9. more or view all topics or full text.
142113206/26/90