All notes for Subtopic 1100.03000 – Standing
| Decision | Description | PERC Vol. | PERC Index | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A478E | Los Angeles Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing A person or entity’s standing depends on the legal claim at issue in the charge. The Board has never interpreted its statutes or regulations to mean that a nonexclusive representative lacks standing to pursue an unfair practice charge alleging a violation of EERA section 3543.5, subdivision (a), which makes it unlawful for a public school employer to “[i]mpose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.” This is because a public employer’s duty to refrain from the conduct prohibited by section 3543.5, subdivision (a) is not dependent on the existence of an exclusive representative. Nor does such a charge interfere with the rights of an exclusive representative to bargain on behalf of the unit. [Citation.] Thus, the presence of an exclusive representative does not divest employees or their nonexclusive representative of the right to file charges alleging violations of employees’ individual statutory rights. The rights at issue are individual rights that aggrieved parties may assert without regard to the existence of an exclusive representative. (pp. 5-6.) more or view all topics or full text. | 44 | 163 | 04/16/20 |
| 2699H | Regents of the University of California (Teamsters Local 2010) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Allowing a nonexclusive representative to assert the rights of employees it represents is particularly important during an organizing campaign, when individual employees may be unable or unwilling to file a charge, or they are unaware of their rights in the first place. A nonexclusive representative need not wait until it becomes the exclusive representative to allege employer interference with the campaign. (p. 8.) more or view all topics or full text. | 44 | 144 | 02/27/20 |
| 2699H | Regents of the University of California (Teamsters Local 2010) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Under HEERA, nonexclusive representatives, i.e., employee organizations not certified as exclusive representatives, have standing to allege violations of the rights of employees they represent. (p. 8.) Although HEERA does not grant them the independent right to represent employees, employees have a statutory right to representation by employee organizations of their own choosing. Nonexclusive representatives thus may assert employees’ rights on their behalf, including their rights to be free from discrimination, interference, or retaliation. (pp. 5-8.) more or view all topics or full text. | 44 | 144 | 02/27/20 |
| 2699H | Regents of the University of California (Teamsters Local 2010) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing PERB Regulation 32602 generally confers standing upon employee organizations to allege unfair practices, depending upon the rights conferred to them by the applicable statute. (pp. 4-5.) more or view all topics or full text. | 44 | 144 | 02/27/20 |
| 2530E | Monterey Peninsula Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An employee has standing to file an unfair practice charge against a former employer to allege that such employer interfered with the employee’s attempt to obtain and/or retain subsequent employment. more or view all topics or full text. | 42 | 2 | 06/19/17 |
| 2525M | City of Livermore 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Employee’s lack of standing, as an employee, to file a unit modification petition under the City’s local rules has no bearing on whether he may bring an unfair practice charge alleging violations of the City’s local rules or of employee rights under the MMBA. Standing is not dispensed “in gross.” Rather, it is evaluated separately for each claim and each form of relief sought. (p. 13.) The Legislature has expressly authorized employees, in their capacity as employees, to bring unfair practice charges alleging either that a public agency has acted in violation of its local rules and/or that it has enforced its local rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the provisions, policies or purposes of the MMBA. (p. 14.) more or view all topics or full text. | 41 | 173 | 05/04/17 |
| 2525M | City of Livermore 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing PERB rejected a City’s contention that it properly applied community of interest criteria to make a unit determination, where the final determination failed to include findings or explain how these various criteria had been applied. (p. 9.) In making unit determinations under its local rules, a public agency must make findings and explain its analytical process in sufficient detail “to enable the parties to determine whether and on what basis they should seek review and, in the event of review, to apprise a reviewing court of the basis for the [public agency’s] action.” (pp. 11-12.) more or view all topics or full text. | 41 | 173 | 05/04/17 |
| 2525M | City of Livermore 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Lack of standing in unfair practice proceedings is jurisdictional and cannot be waived or otherwise affected by the respondent’s failure to assert that defect or by its mistaken belief as to the identity of persons purportedly acting as the authorized agents of a party with proper standing. (pp. 7-8.) As in civil procedure, lack of standing to bring an unfair practice allegation is a “jurisdictional” defect. Because proper standing to bring an action goes to the very existence of a cause of action and the right to relief, it may be raised at any point in unfair practice proceedings, including for the first time on appeal. (p. 8.) more or view all topics or full text. | 41 | 173 | 05/04/17 |
| 2475E | United Teachers of Los Angeles (Raines, et al) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Under relation back doctrine, PERB may include additional charging parties after the limitations period has run if their allegations are identical to those included in a previously-filed charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 40 | 147 | 02/29/16 |
| 2283E | Jurupa Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Under our precedents only an employee organization, and not an individual employee, may bring a charge of domination or interference with an employee organization. Charging party, who makes her allegations as an individual employee and not as an organizational agent or representative, lacks standing to charge her employer with domination or interference with administration of an employee organization. more or view all topics or full text. | 37 | 58 | 08/21/12 |
| 2384H | Trustees of the California State University 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An exclusive representative has standing to allege a violation of HEERA Section 3580.5, where a supervisor’s conduct is alleged to have interfered with, restrained or coerced employees in the exercise of protected rights. more or view all topics or full text. | 39 | 16 | 06/30/14 |
| 2280M | County of Riverside 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Neither represented nor unrepresented employees have standing to contest placement of their position or job classification in a particular bargaining unit. more or view all topics or full text. | 37 | 51 | 08/14/12 |
| 2265E | Oxnard Union High School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees lack standing to allege bargaining violations, including unilateral change violations, and violations of EERA sections that protect the collective bargaining rights of employee organizations. more or view all topics or full text. | 37 | 4 | 05/25/12 |
| 2266E | Oxnard Federation of Teachers (Collins) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees lack standing to allege that an exclusive representative violated its duty to meet and confer with an employer or to allege violations of statutory sections that protect the collective bargaining rights of employee organizations. more or view all topics or full text. | 37 | 5 | 05/25/12 |
| 2246M | City of Santa Monica 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An employer’s duty to provide, upon request, necessary and relevant information to an exclusive representative derives from the duty to bargain in good faith; the duty to bargain in good faith is only owed between an employee organization and the employer, and does not apply to the relationship between an individual employee and the employer; where employee organization withdrew as a charging party to the charge, individual employee lacked standing to pursue an allegation that an employer engaged in bad faith bargaining by failing to comply with an information request. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 149 | 04/06/12 |
| 2198M | Alameda County Management Employees Association (Harper) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An unrepresented employee seeking inclusion in the bargaining unit lacked standing to bring a duty of fair representation charge; the duty of fair representation extends only to bargaining unit employees. Individual employees lack standing to bring a unilateral change charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 36 | 38 | 08/29/11 |
| 2216C | Marin County Superior Court 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An employee lacks standing to allege that the employee’s employer failed to meet and confer with the exclusive representative over the employer’s decision to lay off employees. more or view all topics or full text. | 36 | 78 | 11/09/11 |
| 2147E | Fontana Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Under EERA, public school employers and exclusive representatives owe a mutual duty to meet and confer with one another in good faith concerning issues within the scope of representation. Thus, the employer’s duty to negotiate in good faith is owed to the exclusive representative employee organization. Consequently, individual employees lack standing to allege that an employer has failed to bargain in good faith. more or view all topics or full text. | 35 | 10 | 12/10/10 |
| 2167M | Antelope Valley Hospital District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee lacks standing to allege that employer violated the MMBA by failing to provide him with requested information. more or view all topics or full text. | 35 | 47 | 02/25/11 |
| 2153H | Regents of the University of California 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to allege violations of sections that protect the collective bargaining rights of employee organizations. more or view all topics or full text. | 35 | 21 | 12/30/10 |
| 2140H | Trustees of the California State University (San Marcos) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Employees lacked standing to allege that the employer failed to bargain with their exclusive representative over contracting out bargaining unit work, failed to participate in impasse procedures in good faith, and violated and/or repudiated the contractual grievance procedure. more or view all topics or full text. | 34 | 165 | 11/02/10 |
| 2137H | California State University Employees Union, Service Employees International Union Local 2579 (Sarca) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Because the charging party was not obligated to pay a fair share fee, he lacked standing to allege that the union improperly calculated the fair share fee amount. Although it satisfied the exhaustion of internal challenge procedures requirement in PERB Regulation 32994(a), charging party’s representation of other employees in fair share fee arbitration proceedings did not confer standing upon him. more or view all topics or full text. | 34 | 152 | 10/20/10 |
| 2138M | County of Orange 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing The petitioning union lacked standing to challenge the county’s application of its decertification rule to the union’s severance petition because the union never intended to decertify the incumbent union and thus the county did not apply the rule to the petitioning union’s detriment. more or view all topics or full text. | 34 | 156 | 10/25/10 |
| 2073E | Los Angeles Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party lacked standing to allege that his employer’s breach of contractual grievance procedures constituted an unlawful unilateral change. more or view all topics or full text. | 33 | 178 | 10/28/09 |
| 2065M | County of Riverside 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party lacked standing to allege that her employer failed to meet and confer with her exclusive representative over her reclassification. more or view all topics or full text. | 33 | 162 | 09/25/09 |
| 2000E | San Francisco Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging Party lacked standing to file an unfair practice charge under EERA, when he was not an employee at the time the alleged unfair practice occurred. Charging Party, a former employee of the District, had been laid off approximately 2 years prior to the alleged unlawful act. more or view all topics or full text. | 33 | 31 | 01/20/09 |
| 1982E | Service Employees International Union, Local 221 (Meredith) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee did not have standing to allege a unilateral change by his union. more or view all topics or full text. | 32 | 157 | 10/24/08 |
| 1977M | City of Long Beach 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee did not have standing to allege a unilateral change. more or view all topics or full text. | 32 | 140 | 09/16/08 |
| 1938M | County of Plumas 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Bailiff was without standing to demonstrate a violation of the Trial Court Act by the county. more or view all topics or full text. | 32 | 34 | 01/11/08 |
| 1918S | Union of American Physicians and Dentists (Menaster) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing A Union is not responsible for the actions of an employer. As such, the charge against the union of misconduct by the Department are dismissed. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 135 | 08/09/07 |
| 1913M | City of Beverly Hills (Transportation Department) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual has no standing to allege a unilateral change. Because the charging party did not submit any evidence that he was the executor of his deceased brother’s estate, the Board did not decide whether or not the charging party had standing to file on behalf of his brother. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 116 | 06/26/07 |
| 1914S | Service Employees International Union Local 1000, California State Employees Association (Burnett) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees lack standing to allege that the employee organization violated the rights of an employer. Therefore, the allegation that the union violated § 3519.5(a) is dismissed. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 118 | 06/26/07 |
| 1899E | Service Employees International Union Local 99 (Gutierrez) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing The employee organization is obligated to meet and confer with the public school employer in good faith. However, individual employees lack standing to allege that an employee organization has failed to bargain in good faith. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 90 | 04/16/07 |
| 1902E | Oakland Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to allege unilateral change violations. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 93 | 05/07/07 |
| 1856M | Modesto Irrigation District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual does not have standing to allege interference with protected rights if the employee is not a member of the class affected by the employer’s action. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 1 | 09/01/06 |
| 1857M | IBEW Local 1245 (Tacke) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual does not have standing to allege interference with protected rights if the employee is not a member of the class affected by the employer’s action. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 2 | 09/01/06 |
| 1866H | Trustees of the California State University (Humboldt) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party, a former safety steward, did not have standing to file a charge on behalf of the union. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 26 | 12/14/06 |
| 1867H | State Employees Trades Council-United (Chemello) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charges related to improper unit placement of a position classification appropriately dismissed as individual employees lack standing to challenge unit configuration. more or view all topics or full text. | 31 | 25 | 12/14/06 |
| 1846S | Union of American Physicians and Dentists (Meenakshi, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to allege an exclusive representative violated its duty to meet and confer. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 130 | 05/24/06 |
| 1835S | State of California (Department Of Transportation) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual who filed a charge nearly alleging unfair practices which occurred nearly two years after his State employment was terminated is not a “State employee” under Dills Act section 3513(c) and, therefore lacks standing to invoke the protections of the Dills Act. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 108 | 04/10/06 |
| 1782C | Lake County Superior Court 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to file a charge alleging the employer failed to comply with the meet and confer requirements of the Trial Court Act. Individual employees do not have standing to pursue the meet and confer rights of an employee organization. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 7 | 11/01/05 |
| 1804H | Regents of the University of California 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing The Board has held that an individual employee does not have standing to pursue violations of the rights of an employee organization. The exclusive representative of the clerical unit is the sole entity that is entitled to question, challenge, or bargain the effects related to the University's elimination of a classification, or its creation of a new classification, including whether or not the new classification belongs in the clerical unit. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 44 | 01/04/06 |
| 1807M | Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Mauriello) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to allege unilateral change violations (Oxnard School District (Gorcey and Tripp) (1988) PERB Decision No. 667), nor allege violations of sections which protect the collective bargaining rights of employee organizations (State of California (Department of Corrections) (1993) PERB Decision No. 972-S). more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 51 | 01/13/06 |
| 1810H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Baratelli) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 53 | 01/18/06 |
| 1811H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America, Local 9119 (Crisosto) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 55 | 01/18/06 |
| 1812H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Bailey) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 54 | 01/18/06 |
| 1813H | California State Employees Association (Sarca) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Paying agency fees in prior year does not give employee standing to object to agency fees based on belief that union is collecting non-chargeable fees and maintaining a surplus of funds in year where no agency fees are accepted by the union. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 57 | 01/27/06 |
| 1784H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Abernathy, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 9 | 12/01/05 |
| 1800H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Lee) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 41 | 12/30/05 |
| 1801H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Joshel) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violations of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 42 | 12/30/05 |
| 1802H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Widman) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 43 | 12/30/05 |
| 1803H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Brooks) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 45 | 12/30/05 |
| 1798H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Van Sluis) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 39 | 12/30/05 |
| 1799H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Cooper) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 40 | 12/30/05 |
| 1793H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Carter, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 34 | 12/30/05 |
| 1794H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Gill, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 35 | 12/30/05 |
| 1795H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Chanes, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 36 | 12/30/05 |
| 1796H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Welch, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 37 | 12/30/05 |
| 1797H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Boylan) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and that there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 38 | 12/30/05 |
| 1792H | University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119 (Aldern, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held agency fee payers have standing to challenge violation of PERB Regulation 32992 and there is harm in violating the regulation that is separate from any harm that is remedied by returning fees. more or view all topics or full text. | 30 | 33 | 12/30/05 |
| 1624E | Antelope Valley College Federation of Teachers (Stryker) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Similar to the situation in California State Employees Association (Barker & Osuna) (2003) PERB Decision No. 1551-S, the Federation’s removal of Stryker from the negotiating team differs from suspension or dismissal from membership governed by EERA section 3543.1(a). Therefore, the Federation did not interfere with protected rights under EERA. The Federation did not discriminate against Stryker under EERA since removal from the negotiating team is an internal union matter and Stryker provided no facts showing a substantial impact on the employer-employee relationship more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 146 | 04/28/04 |
| 1607H | California Nurses Association (O'Malley) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing O’Malley may not assert agency fee objections on behalf of other unit employees. Under Los Rios College Federation of Teachers, Local 2279, CFT/AFT (Deglow) (1992) PERB Decision No. 950, once CNA refunded the collected fees in full to O’Malley, CNA could not use the fees in any way, let along wrongfully use them. Thus there is no possibility of harm that the Board could remedy. more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 117 | 03/18/04 |
| 1620M | Alameda County Medical Center 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Under the MMBA, only the bargaining representative has standing to allege a violation of the right to meet and confer or other rights only accorded to the exclusive representative. more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 142 | 04/21/04 |
| 1576E | Peralta Community College District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual lacks the standing necessary to allege violations of an EERA provision that protects an employee organization’s right to consult with an employer or a unilateral change. more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 44 | 12/31/03 |
| 1670E | Orange Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to bring unilateral change violation charges nor allegations of violation of sections that protect the collective bargaining rights of employee organizations such as the right to receive information that is accurate. more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 214 | 07/28/04 |
| 1651H | California Nurses Association (O'Malley) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Board held that non-agency fee payer had no standing to challenge union’s calculation and auditing of agency fees. Non-agency fee payer also could not bring challenge on behalf of other agency fee payers. more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 189 | 06/29/04 |
| 1559S | State of California (Department of Corrections) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Employee does not have standing to file a request for information case because duty to provide information extenst to the exclusive representative and not to an individual employee. more or view all topics or full text. | 28 | 15 | 11/21/03 |
| 1530S | California Correctional Peace Officers Association (Moore) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Under the EEBR, a supervisory employee does not have standing to bring a charge with the Board on his own behalf alleging a threat of reprisal against him and his staff by a union chapter president. An exception to this rule might occur if the alleged conduct adversely impacts the rights of unit employees. more or view all topics or full text. | 27 | 90 | 06/20/03 |
| 1531M | City of Folsom 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing A violation of MMBA section 3505 by the City for refusing a request by the union representative to schedule a meeting to resolve the dispute and refusing a request by the union representative to submit the dispute to an arbitrator is only actionable by the union. more or view all topics or full text. | 27 | 89 | 06/20/03 |
| 1539M | City of Folsom 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing As Siroky had not worked for the City of Folsom since 1998 but worked for the State of California at the time the alleged protected activity and adverse action occurred (2002), he is not a “public employee” under MMBA sections 3501(c), (d) and 3506 for purposes of this charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 27 | 99 | 06/26/03 |
| 1519H | Regents of the University of California (Los Alamos National Laboratory) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Enter, as an individual employee, lacked standing to allege a unilateral change by the employer for denying her a choice of representative in a disciplinary hearing. more or view all topics or full text. | 27 | 67 | 05/07/03 |
| 1493E | California School Employees Association and its Chapter 245 (Waymire) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Since Waymire is not a “public school employee” as defined in Section 3540.1(j), he lacks standing to invoke the protection of EERA. more or view all topics or full text. | 26 | 33105 | 07/31/02 |
| 1492E | Monterey Peninsula Community College District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Since Waymire is not a “public school employee” as defined in Section 3540.1(j), he lacks standing to invoke the protection of EERA. more or view all topics or full text. | 26 | 33104 | 07/31/02 |
| 1478H | Regents of the University of California 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to allege unilateral change violations, therefore allegation that university did not take into consideration evidence charging party wished to produce failed to state prima facie case. more or view all topics or full text. | 26 | 33048 | 03/12/02 |
| 1426E | West Contra Costa Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing No violation of EERA section 3543.5(c), which obligates the employer to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative, because individual employees lack standing to pursue such a charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 25 | 32050 | 04/04/01 |
| 1427E | West Contra Costa Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee lacks standing to pursue a failure to negotiate charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 25 | 32058 | 04/19/01 |
| 1420S | State of California (Department of General Services) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Duty to bargain in good faith is not owed to employees and an individual employee therefore lacks standing to bring a charge regarding a failure to bargain. more or view all topics or full text. | 25 | 32039 | 02/26/01 |
| 1360E | Los Angeles County Office of Education (Burton) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging Party did not have standing to allege the District unilaterally changed the Representation Rights article of the Agreement between District and recognized employee organization. more or view all topics or full text. | 24 | 31016 | 11/03/99 |
| 1441E | United Teachers of Los Angeles (Hopper) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party was not a member of the class which she claims was harmed. Charging party suffered no harm in this case, nor does she have any potential for harm. She therefore has no standing to challenge union's alleged failure to provide notice of certain rights. more or view all topics or full text. | 25 | 32074 | 05/31/01 |
| 1380S | California State Employees Association (Hutchinson) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing The charge alleged that violated Dills Act section 3519.5 where the charge involves conduct between an employee organization and a terminated employee which occurred subsequent to the termination of that individual from State employment, the former employee lacks standing to file an unfair practice charge against the employee organization based on that conduct. However, that holding does not alter the longstanding rule that terminated employees have the right under the Dills Act to challenge the termination itself as discriminatory, because such persons were State employees at the time of the allegedly unlawful conduct that formed the basis of the charge. (California Union of Safety Employees (Trevisanut, et al.) (1993) PERB Decision No. 1029-S, at p. 9. more or view all topics or full text. | 24 | 31065 | 02/29/00 |
| 1316H | Regents of the University of California (Society of Professional Scientists and Engineers) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing In non-exclusive representative case under HEERA, the violation runs to the individual employee but because there is no difference between the employee and the organization, the organization has standing to pursue the charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30066 | 02/24/99 |
| 1329S | State of California (Department of Corrections) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to allege unilateral change violations. (Oxnard School District (Gorcey/Tripp) (1988) PERB Decision No. 667. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30116 | 05/03/99 |
| 1310E | Teachers Association of Long Beach (Akers, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Where charge presented no evidence that organization was an employee organization within the meaning of EERA section 3540.1(d), Board found that organization had no standing to file a charge under the EERA; p. 3, warning letter. PERB Regulation 32994(a) requires that an agency fee payer who wishes to challenge the amount of the fee by filing an unfair practice charge must first exhaust the exclusive representative’s agency fee appeal procedure unless the procedure is insufficient on its face; warning letter. Where there was no evidence of exhaustion, the charge is dismissed; participation in the arbitration must be in the year that is under challenge in the unfair; warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30048 | 01/27/99 |
| 1311E | Teachers Association of Long Beach (Aragon, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Where charge presented no evidence that organization was an employee organization within the meaning of EERA section 3540.1(d), Board found that organization had no standing to file a charge under the EERA; p. 3, warning letter. PERB Regulation 32994(a) requires that an agency fee payer who wishes to challenge the amount of the fee by filing an unfair practice charge must first exhaust the exclusive representative’s agency fee appeal procedure unless the procedure is insufficient on its face; warning letter. Where there was no evidence of exhaustion, the charge is dismissed; warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30049 | 01/27/99 |
| 1312E | Teachers Association of Long Beach (Filinuk, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Where charge presented no evidence that organization was an employee organization within the meaning of EERA section 3540.1(d), Board found that organization had no standing to file a charge under the EERA; p. 3, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30050 | 01/27/99 |
| 1309E | Oakland Education Association (Bettencourt, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing PERB Regulation 32994(a) requires that an agency fee payer who wishes to challenge the amount of the fee by filing an unfair practice charge must first exhaust the exclusive representative’s agency fee appeal procedure unless the procedure is insufficient on its face; p. 3, warning letter. Where there was no evidence of exhaustion, the charge is dismissed; p. 3, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30047 | 01/27/99 |
| A148E | Riverside Unified School District (Petrich) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual employee acting on his own behalf is neither an "employer" nor an "employee organization" and thus does not have standing to file a unit modification petition. more or view all topics or full text. | 9 | 16190 | 08/13/85 |
| A148Ea | Riverside Unified School District (Petrich) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual employee acting on his own behalf is neither an "employer" nor an "employee organization" and thus does not have standing to file a unit modification petition. more or view all topics or full text. | 10 | 17031 | 12/23/85 |
| A102H | Phase II Professional and Operations Hearings (Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act-University of California) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing A party of interest may participate as fully in a representation hearing as a petitioner or intervenor. An employee organization is not disadvantaged for purposes of participating in a subsequent election by designation as a party of interest. more or view all topics or full text. | 4 | 11176 | 10/02/80 |
| 1294E | Kern High School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party, an individual, lacks standing to assert a unilateral change violation against the District based on the District's one time refusal to process a withdrawal from membership under the contract; p. 3, partial warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 23 | 30008 | 10/22/98 |
| 1226S | California Correctional Peace Officers Association (Smith, et al.) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Managerial and supervisory employees are not covered by the Dills Act and do not have standing under the Dills Act to file an unfair practice charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 22 | 29006 | 11/05/97 |
| 1197S | State of California (Department of Insurance) (Nylander-McGuire) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing The individual employee lacks standing to file a bad faith bargaining or unilateral change charge against an employer; p. 3, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 21 | 28094 | 05/06/97 |
| 1191E | Bakersfield City School District (Guerra) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Exclusively represented individual employee lacks standing to challenge employer refusal to meet and confer in good faith; p. 6, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 21 | 28071 | 04/03/97 |
| 1196E | Service Employees International Union, Local 99 (Vercher) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees lack standing to allege that an employee organization failed to negotiate in good faith with the employer; p. 2; p. 2, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 21 | 28092 | 05/02/97 |
| 1161E | Santa Rosa Junior College (Aune) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Exclusive representative has exclusive right to elevate a grievance to arbitration, employer cannot be compelled to arbitrate by employee, employer refusal to do so is not an unfair practice; p. 3, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 20 | 27114 | 06/26/96 |
| 1120E | Morgan Hill Unified School District (Caviglia) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees lack standing to file a charge with PERB to allege a violation of organizational rights under EERA section 3543.5(c); p. 3. more or view all topics or full text. | 19 | 26148 | 10/13/95 |
| 1116E | Service Employees International Union, Local 715 (Caviglia) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing A charge of a refusal by the exclusive representative to bargain in good faith must be brought by the employer, and cannot be brought by an individual employee since the employee organization's duty to bargain is owed to the employer, not to the individual unit employees; pp. 2-3, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 19 | 26133 | 09/14/95 |
| 1118E | Alum Rock Education Association (Kirkaldie) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual employee lacks standing to raise a claim of failure to negotiate since PERB has held that the duty to negotiate is a reciprocal one between the exclusive representative and the public school employer; p. 10, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 19 | 26143 | 10/04/95 |
| 1112E | Rocklin Teachers Professional Association (Romero) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing A management employee lacks standing to file an unfair practice charge; p. 4. more or view all topics or full text. | 19 | 26122 | 08/10/95 |
| 1060E | Los Angeles Community College District (Mrvichin) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing The issue of "standing" (jurisdiction over the parties) is separate and distinguishable from the issue of whether the elements of a prima facie case exist. Neither the EERA jurisdictional statute nor PERB regulations requires a charging party to establish "prima facie standing;" p. 8. more or view all topics or full text. | 18 | 25150 | 10/05/94 |
| 1029S | California Union of Safety Employees (Trevisanut) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing In order to have standing to file a charge, a person must have been an employee at the time the unfair practice occurred. Subsequent retirement or separation from state service does not invalidate standing; p. 9. more or view all topics or full text. | 18 | 25026 | 12/13/93 |
| 1020S | State of California (Employment Development Department) (Gonzales) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Where charging party alleges a denial of his Weingarten rights, the six-month limitations period begins to run when the employee requests and is denied representation; p. 2, dismissal letter; p. 2, warning letter. more or view all topics or full text. | 17 | 24171 | 10/21/93 |
| 0972S | State of California, Department of Corrections (Thomas) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual unit member does not have standing to pursue violations of rights of an employee organization. When the union withdrew from prosecuting these violations, the legal effect was the same as if the charges had been withdrawn; p. 3; p. 8, dismissal. The right of an employee organization to represent its members is not a right that an individual member can appropriately vindicate; p. 6, dismissal. more or view all topics or full text. | 17 | 24047 | 02/09/93 |
| 0902E | San Diego Teachers Association (Hernandez) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual does not have standing to allege a violation of EERA section 3543.6(c); p. 3, fn. 3. more or view all topics or full text. | 15 | 22152 | 09/19/91 |
| 0898E | California School Employees Association (Lohmann) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing An individual does not have standing to raise a violation of 3543.6(c). more or view all topics or full text. | 15 | 22138 | 08/30/91 |
| 0879E | San Diego Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual does not have standing to file charge of a (c) violation. more or view all topics or full text. | 15 | 22088 | 05/21/91 |
| 0856E | Elk Grove Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee does not have standing to allege a violation of 3543.5(c); pp. 4, 5. more or view all topics or full text. | 15 | 22009 | 12/17/90 |
| 0849H | Regents of the University of California (Irvin) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee does not have standing to file charge alleging breach of employer's duty to bargain under HEERA. more or view all topics or full text. | 14 | 21207 | 10/30/90 |
| 0741E | Hacienda La Puente Unified School District * * * SUPERSEDED by amendment to EERA section 3543.5, subdivision (a) Stats. 1989, Ch. 313 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing * * * SUPERSEDED by Stats. 1989, ch. 313, § 2, which amended EERA section 3543.5(a) to explicitly state that EERA’s prohibitions against discrimination and interference with employee rights apply to applicants for employment or reemployment. * * *An individual seeking reemployment is not an employee under EERA and thus lacks standing to invoke the protection of the Act; p. 2. more or view all topics or full text. | 13 | 20129 | 06/16/89 |
| 0719H | California State University, (United Professors of California) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Nonexclusive representative has no standing to file an unfair practice charge alledging a violation of HEERA section 3571(c) when exclusive representative is certified. more or view all topics or full text. | 13 | 20038 | 01/19/89 |
| 0710H | California State University (Pomona) (Hollis) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Pursuant to Oxnard School District (Gorcey/Tripp) (1988) PERB Decision No. 667, individuals do not have standing to bring a charge of bad faith bargaining against the employer. more or view all topics or full text. | 13 | 20018 | 12/21/88 |
| 0685E | Hacienda La Puente Unified School District * * * SUPERSEDED by amendment to EERA section 3543.5, subdivision (a) Stats. 1989, Ch. 313 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing * * * SUPERSEDED ON OTHER GROUNDS by Stats. 1989, ch. 313, § 2. * * *Employee organization has standing to allege 3543.5(b) violation where applicant for employment is subject of discrimination. more or view all topics or full text. | 12 | 19113 | 06/24/88 |
| 0686E | Los Angeles Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual has no standing to assert a refusal to bargain charge against the employer. more or view all topics or full text. | 12 | 19114 | 06/24/88 |
| 0669E | Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Fikes) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Unit member has standing to allege employer and employee organization interference with conduct of agency fee election irrespective of whether or not unit member actually "voted." more or view all topics or full text. | 12 | 19082 | 05/31/88 |
| 0664E | Oxnard Educators Association (Gorcey and Tripp) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to file a charge against the exclusive representative alleging its failure to negotiate with the District. Employees' recourse is a charge alleging union's violation of its duty of fair representation. more or view all topics or full text. | 12 | 19067 | 05/05/88 |
| 0667E | Oxnard School District (Gorcey and Tripp) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employees do not have standing to file charge alleging violation of EERA section 3543.5(C); South San Francisco (1980) PERB Decision No. 112 expressly overruled. more or view all topics or full text. | 12 | 19080 | 05/26/88 |
| 0658E | Berkeley Federation of Teachers, Local 1078, AFL-CIO (Moore) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging Party (a unit member) lacks standing to file an EERA section 3543.6(c) allegation (failure to bargain in good faith) against her union where it is independent of a breach of a duty of fair representation claim. A charge of a refusal by the exclusive representative to bargain in good faith must be brought by the employer, and cannot be brought by an individual employee since the union's duty to bargain is owed to the employer, not to individual unit members. more or view all topics or full text. | 12 | 19043 | 02/22/88 |
| 1748E | Alum Rock Union Elementary School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charge alleging unilateral change filed by an individual was dismissed as only the exclusive representative has standing to allege a failure to meet and confer. more or view all topics or full text. | 29 | 73 | 02/07/05 |
| 0512E | Riverside Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Employee/unit member has no standing under PERB regulations to challenge unit configuration. more or view all topics or full text. | 9 | 16158 | 06/21/85 |
| 0450E | San Leandro Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Association of retired employees lacks standing under section 3541.5(a) to file unfair practice charge because it is not an "employee organization" under the statute. more or view all topics or full text. | 9 | 16017 | 12/06/84 |
| 0417E | Los Angeles Community College District (Kimmett) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual unit member has no standing to file unfair practice charge alleging that employer denied him the right to attend negotiating session as a member of union negotiating team. The right to choose negotiating team members belongs solely to the union and union was the aggrieved party. When union was satisfied by employer's admission that it acted improperly and promised not to bar individual from future meetings, the member had no standing to keep issue alive by filing charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 8 | 15193 | 10/18/84 |
| 0418E | Los Angeles Community College District (Kimmett) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Although an individual unit member has standing to file a charge alleging failure to negotiate in good faith, the right to demand that the employer furnish information runs solely in favor of the exclusive representative. Where the union is satisfied with the employer's response to an information request, individual employees may not insert themselves between the employer and the exclusive representative. more or view all topics or full text. | 8 | 15194 | 10/18/84 |
| 0304S | State of California (Department of Transportation) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing As there was no exclusive representative at the time of the alleged violation or when the charge was filed, nonexclusive representative has standing to represent employees in unfair practice charge; p. 16. more or view all topics or full text. | 7 | 14134 | 04/26/83 |
| 0172E | Hayward Unified School District (Weld) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Employee has no standing to file unfair practice charge alleging that employer improperly encouraged management employees to join an organization by offer an insurance benefits only to those who did. If employee is management employee, she is not covered under EERA and cannot file charge. Alternatively, if employee is not management employee, she is ineligible for contested benefit, is thus not affected by employer's action and has no standing to file charge. more or view all topics or full text. | 5 | 12108 | 08/24/81 |
| 1002H | Regents of the University of California (Alderson) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual employee does not have standing to file charge alleging employer's duty to bargain under HEERA; p. 4. more or view all topics or full text. | 17 | 24115 | 06/23/93 |
| 0983H | Regents of the University of California (Alavarez) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party lacked standing to assert violations of an employee organization's statutory rights. more or view all topics or full text. | 17 | 24063 | 03/22/93 |
| 0984H | American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (Alvarez) 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Charging party lacked standing to assert violations of the exclusive representative's statutory bargaining obligations, and to file an unfair practice charge challenging bargaining unit composition; pp. 4-5. more or view all topics or full text. | 17 | 24064 | 03/23/93 |
| 0112E | South San Francisco Unified School District (Martin) * * * OVERRULED by Oxnard School District (Gorcey and Tripp) (1988) PERB Decision No. 667 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Individual has standing to file charge claiming that the employer has refused to negotiate with the exclusive representative; individual not required to join exclusive representative as a party; pp. 4-11. more or view all topics or full text. | 4 | 11009 | 01/15/80 |
| 0104E | Santa Clara Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Neither union's nonexclusive status nor employees nonmembership prevents the union from being the charging party; addition of affected employee as second charging party "could easily cure" any defect, and no party has objected to union's standing herein; p. 13, fn. 6. more or view all topics or full text. | 3 | 10124 | 09/26/79 |
| 0045E | El Rancho Unified School District 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Employer has standing to file an unfair practice charge which seeks to vindicate and protect the rights of its employees. The employer has an interest in maintaining a peaceful atmosphere not disrupted by threats or intimidation of employees. more or view all topics or full text. | 2 | 2024 | 12/30/77 |
| 0058E | Hanford Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees 1100.03000: CASE PROCESSING PROCEDURES; CHARGE; Standing Nonexclusive representative has no standing to file unfair practice charge over denial of representional rights after recognition of exclusive representative, even though conducted occurred prior to recognition; pp. 6-8. more or view all topics or full text. | 2 | 2137 | 06/27/78 |